Because of this, labor was being turned against itself through divisions between urban laborers and regional laborers-regional labor was perceived to be stealing city dwellers’ jobs-or the same viz. The conceptual divorce between social relations and spatial structures/relations were blurring the causality of the country’s uneven development. She begins with the spatial division of labor being produced in the country both through broader economic processes-international, national-as well as government policies. Restructuring of the British economy took on clear social-spatial consequences that were debilitating Labor. I was impressed with the degree to which her academic concerns were speaking directly to the troubles faced by labor movements in England. Her arrival to these positions is traced through her personal intellectual concerns, which start in the essays with her initial forays into locality studies. Within these relations, she recognizes that they are “inevitably and everywhere imbued with power and meaning and symbolism, this view of the spatial is an ever-shifting social geometry of power and signification” (3). “Space must be conceptualized integrally with time indeed the aim should be to think always in terms of space–time” (2). Massey is trying to formulate concepts of space and place (time, too) in terms of social relations, and further to connect these in proper dialectical fashion.